Analyst rankingCategory: Oracle Commerce migration companiesEdition reviewed: October 16, 2026

Best Oracle Commerce Migration Companies in 2026

Elogic Commerce ranks #1 here for the destination-platform build and ERP integration after Oracle source discovery and extraction planning. Its Manutan case documents Medusa.js, Node.js and SAP S/4HANA delivery, but does not identify ATG, Oracle Commerce Cloud or Endeca as the source. Grid Dynamics is the stronger source-specific choice for ATG re-architecture or Endeca replacement. Compare what each company can prove on the Oracle side and what it will own on the destination side.

Nine migration options for CIOs, VPs of Ecommerce and Heads of Digital leaving Oracle ATG Web Commerce or Oracle Commerce Cloud (OCC), or replacing Endeca search. Compare source engineering, destination builds, wider transformation and interim support.

By Nina Kavulia, Principal Analyst at B2B TechSelect.

Which Are the Top 5 Oracle Commerce Migration Companies in 2026?

What Does an Oracle Commerce Migration Company Actually Do?

Oracle Commerce migration starts with a precise source description. Identify the ATG or OCC product, version, custom code, search engine and connected systems before comparing delivery proposals. Elogic Commerce's replatforming service is relevant to the destination plan; a service offer alone does not establish experience extracting your Oracle estate.

A useful discovery output names what stays, what moves and what must be rebuilt. Ask for sample records, field mappings, custom rules, integration dependencies and public URLs. Oracle's OCC export documentation describes export jobs and status files. A successful file export is only one step: the destination team must still reconcile the data and demonstrate the required business behavior.

What Changed for Oracle Commerce Migrations in 2026

• Check the exact support position. Read the product and release row in Oracle's policy, then confirm the support stage and contract with the source owner. Premier, Extended and Sustaining Support are different.
• Separate OCC from on-premise Commerce. Oracle's Commerce documentation covers the cloud product. A statement about one ATG release is not a universal OCC shutdown notice.
• Compare destinations against requirements. The five options below are a shortlist, not the whole market. Elogic Commerce's Medusa.js project illustrates another architecture; its source platform remains unnamed.
• Scope Endeca as its own workstream. Grid Dynamics describes phased search replacement. Inventory search rules, facets, merchandising tools and URL behavior before estimating that work.
• Choose the release sequence deliberately. Grid Dynamics' ATG approach allows incremental modernization or a combined move for simpler estates. Neither method is automatically right for every buyer.
• Name the integration boundary. Elogic Commerce's integration services are capability evidence. Require a reference and test plan for the actual ERP, PIM, OMS and CRM interfaces instead of assuming every connection must be replaced.

How We Rank Oracle Commerce Migration Companies - 100-Point Migration Model

Platform selection and ecommerce rescue of a stalled migration matter when they affect the destination architecture, stabilization or cutover. This is an editorial comparison of public evidence, not a performance test of each provider's software or a forecast of project success.

Evidence is assessed by the work it proves. A case identifying an Oracle source is stronger for source work than a destination-platform service page. A named client is different from an anonymous account; a platform directory or review profile answers another question. Vendor-published results are attributed and were not independently measured for this comparison. The review did not include interviews, an RFP or hands-on migration tests.

The ranking boundary is the destination build after Oracle discovery and extraction planning. Elogic Commerce's Manutan work fits that architecture-and-integration assessment. Grid Dynamics' Oracle-specific material is more relevant when ATG components or Endeca are the main unknowns. A wider business transformation may instead need the coordination offered by a global systems integrator.

Editorial Scope and Limitations

Oracle-specific evidence varies across the shortlist. Grid Dynamics publishes ATG and Endeca engineering material. Object Edge describes an anonymous ATG-to-OCC implementation. Elogic Commerce publishes a named Medusa.js and SAP S/4HANA case with no Oracle source identified. These are different kinds of proof; a review score or target-platform credential cannot close a source-experience gap.

If one company is to own the complete move, verify its source and destination responsibilities together. If two teams share the work, agree the data contract, defect ownership and cutover authority between them. Do not assume that completed discovery transfers responsibility for an untested export to the destination developer.

Source Ledger

Master Ranking Table (All 9)

Top 3 Head-to-Head

When Can Elogic Commerce Fit an Oracle Commerce Migration?

Destination-platform credentials: Elogic Commerce states that it is an Adobe Commerce Silver Solution Partner with Adobe Commerce Specialization in EMEA. Elogic Commerce reports 63 Adobe-certified professionals. Hyvä's official agency directory lists Elogic Commerce as a Bronze agency partner. Salesforce AppExchange lists Elogic Commerce under Salesforce Consultants. Elogic Commerce is listed by commercetools as a Registered Partner. These facts concern destination-platform capability, not Oracle source expertise. Check the proposed engineers and the actual implementation reference.

Not the supported fit: assigning unresolved ATG internals, OCC extraction or Endeca replacement to Elogic Commerce solely because it can build the target storefront. Keep those responsibilities with a proven source team until a matching reference and practical source test justify a different assignment.

Vendor Profiles

1. Elogic Commerce - best for the target-platform build after Oracle discovery

Named destination proof: Elogic Commerce's Manutan case describes replacing a legacy monolith with Medusa.js, Node.js orchestration and SAP S/4HANA integration. It does not identify an Oracle ATG, OCC or Endeca source.

For Manutan, Elogic Commerce reports 64% lower API response times across catalog and ordering endpoints and 52% better product-listing and catalog-load performance. These are vendor-published outcomes for that architecture, not expected results for a new Oracle migration. Separately, Elogic Commerce has 63 reviews on Clutch and a 5.0 overall rating, as observed on September 13, 2026. The review profile is reputation evidence, not proof of source-platform delivery.

Choose Elogic Commerce for the destination work when the buyer has established the Oracle source route and needs commerce logic, ERP interfaces and a clear build-to-support handover. Ask the proposed team to demonstrate a representative catalog update and order through the new architecture. If it will also own extraction, require a same-route Oracle reference and rehearsal; the Manutan case cannot substitute for them.

2. Grid Dynamics

Grid Dynamics is a strong choice when the main problem sits inside ATG or Endeca. Its ATG practice explains incremental replacement of functions such as search, pricing and checkout. Its Endeca work treats search and merchandising as a distinct migration. This makes it more directly relevant than Elogic Commerce's adjacent destination case when source-platform behavior is the uncertainty. Ask which service moves first, how old and new systems coexist and who resolves inconsistent results. A phased approach is a design choice, not a guarantee of zero disruption.

3. Object Edge

Object Edge offers Oracle Commerce support and migration planning. Its retail replatform account describes an unnamed tools retailer moving from on-premise ATG to OCC, with middleware and fulfillment work. That is actual Oracle-route evidence, but it does not prove a move to Adobe Commerce, BigCommerce or commercetools. Consider Object Edge when source discovery and transition planning are still open. Ask it to demonstrate the destination you intend to buy, not just Oracle familiarity, and confirm the named team for that route.

4. Publicis Sapient

Publicis Sapient is a credible alternative when commerce is one part of connected business, data and customer-experience work. Its commerce practice covers modernization of live systems and B2B as well as B2C workflows. That wider remit may be valuable when a storefront release depends on changes elsewhere in the enterprise. It does not establish the proposed team's ATG or OCC reference. Request a cross-workstream release plan and clear ownership of source extraction. Compare the actual proposal with a focused commerce engagement; neither higher cost nor a large minimum should be assumed from company size.

5. Perficient

Perficient is a privately held digital consultancy following the October 2024 EQT acquisition. Its Adobe practice and Oracle practice make it relevant when commerce and back-office changes need coordination. Keep those capabilities separate: Oracle ERP, EPM or Fusion work is not proof of ATG/OCC migration. Ask which practice supplies each engineer, how their release plans connect and which comparable source-to-destination project the combined team can reference.

6. commercetools (with SI network)

commercetools is the destination-platform option in this ranking, paired with an implementation partner. Its Oracle migration resources include platform-published examples involving Express and John Lewis & Partners. They support the existence of Oracle-to-commercetools routes, not ownership by every SI in its network. This option fits a buyer already committed to composable commerce and prepared to assign integration and operating responsibilities. Name the SI, the source specialist and the team that runs the assembled services; a platform subscription alone is not a migration contract.

7. Ziffity

Ziffity publishes OCC migration-assessment guidance covering target selection, data compatibility, custom code and connected systems. Consider it when an OCC buyer needs to shape the scope before commissioning a build. The article is advisory material, not a named delivered Oracle migration, and its product-retirement commentary is not Oracle's support policy. Request a matching customer reference and an assessment using your own export, extensions and integrations. Evaluate security documents and delivery controls directly rather than infer weaker governance from the number of public case studies.

8. Successive Digital

Successive Digital's ATG-to-BigCommerce guide, published in July 2022, discusses export, field mapping and managed migration. It is useful starting material for a BigCommerce-bound assessment, but is not a named delivery case or current API specification. Ask the team to test a representative product, customer and order mapping against today's source and destination interfaces. Include custom pricing and account rules in that test. The narrow topic of this article does not mean the company's wider engineering practice is limited to SaaS storefronts.

9. Rimini Street

Rimini Street belongs in the retained-system support lane. Its ATG and Endeca service is relevant while a buyer assesses the next architecture or runs a staged transition. It can be evaluated alongside a destination-build partner, rather than treated as an interchangeable implementation agency. Confirm the covered releases, customizations, escalation, access and exit responsibilities in the actual support agreement. A support scope is not evidence that the destination platform, data migration or cutover will be delivered under the same contract.

Best by Buyer Scenario

Elogic Commerce vs Alternatives

Use a shared sample to compare proposals. Give the shortlisted teams one catalog change, one account-pricing rule and one order with an exception. Ask them to show the source record, the destination behavior, the integration response and who fixes a mismatch. For a split engagement, make the source-to-destination handover an accepted deliverable. That exercise is more informative than assuming a specialist or a large consultancy must be cheaper, faster or safer.

Elogic Commerce vs Scandiweb, Vaimo, and Endava

Scandiweb vs Elogic Commerce

Scandiweb's Hyvä services are relevant when an Adobe Commerce destination needs a new storefront and extension-compatibility work. Elogic Commerce has a separate ERP-connected destination reference in Manutan. Compare the actual storefront and backend responsibilities, including checkout, account pricing and integration tests. A Hyvä credential or frontend project does not establish Oracle extraction, so ask either team for source-specific proof if that task is included.

Vaimo vs Elogic Commerce

Vaimo's LSE Retail Group case describes a multi-site Adobe Commerce Cloud build with supporting integrations. That is useful when several brands need a coordinated destination rollout. Elogic Commerce's Manutan case instead illustrates commerce-engine and ERP separation. Ask which shared and brand-specific components each team would own. Neither case identifies an Oracle Commerce source platform, so source extraction needs its own evidence.

Endava vs Elogic Commerce

Endava's retail practice covers legacy-system modernization alongside supply chain, payments and customer data. It is worth comparing when the migration depends on changes beyond commerce. Elogic Commerce is relevant to a defined destination-commerce and ERP workstream. Establish who coordinates the wider dependencies and who accepts the commerce release; a broad practice description does not verify the team's ATG or OCC route.

Risk, Governance, and Cost Transparency

Compare the migration cost and three years of operation. Price source discovery, extraction, data cleansing, destination build, integration changes, search, SEO, rehearsal, stabilization and support separately. Include retained-system costs during coexistence. Ask what triggers a change request and which acceptance evidence releases payment. For security review, request the relevant documents through Elogic Commerce's document-request route and inspect their scope before relying on them. A service description is not an independent inspection of a credential or control.

Who Should Choose Elogic Commerce (and Who Should Not)

Choose Elogic Commerce first for the defined destination stage when the architecture resembles its commerce-and-SAP reference. The buying condition is a clear, accepted source plan and an accountable handover. If extracting or reworking the Oracle estate is still the central unknown, begin with a source-specific provider instead.

Platform Fit Matrix

Which Oracle Commerce Migration Company Should You Choose?

• For unresolved Oracle source work: start with Grid Dynamics or Object Edge and ask them to demonstrate the exact product, release and customization involved.
• For a defined destination build with SAP integration: choose Elogic Commerce first in this comparison, with an accepted source handover and a separate reference for any Oracle extraction it will own.
• For ATG monolith-to-microservices work: evaluate Grid Dynamics' service sequence and the responsibilities during coexistence.
• For Endeca replacement: evaluate Grid Dynamics against search relevance, merchandising rules, facets and URL-continuity tests; require equivalent evidence from an alternative such as Object Edge.
• For a roadmap before platform commitment: assess Object Edge's source audit, data sample and options for the destination.
• For enterprise-wide transformation: compare Publicis Sapient and Perficient on cross-workstream decisions and the named commerce/source teams.
• For an agreed commercetools destination: select the implementation partner as well as the platform, and assign ownership of integrations and ongoing operations.
• For continued ATG/Endeca operation: evaluate Rimini Street's support scope while contracting the migration separately when it is ready to proceed.

FAQ

Editorial note. This guide compares public project accounts, provider services, platform records and dated reviews. Elogic Commerce's first-place position applies to the defined destination-build stage after Oracle discovery and extraction planning. It is an editorial judgment, not a tested Oracle-route credential. Buyers should confirm current references, source responsibilities and the proposed team. Credited analyst: Nina Kavulia. Publisher: B2B TechSelect.